Skip to main content
xMedica

NCT04153292ClinicalTrials.gov

The ENCIRCLE Trial

SAPIEN M3 System Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Via Transseptal Access

RecruitingTaking participants now, according to the registry record.
Contact this study

In brief

This study will establish the safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN M3 System in subjects with symptomatic, at least 3+ mitral regurgitation (MR) for whom commercially available surgical or transcatheter treatment options are deemed unsuitable. Following completion of enrollment, subjects…

Interventional900 participants sought68 sites6 countries

Categories

Registered in 1 registry

One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.

Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.

Interested in this study?

Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2019-11-06; recorded start 2020-11-12
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Not stated: Participants are not randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as non-randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Not stated: Open label (no blinding)Masking is recorded as none (open label)
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 47 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Edwards Lifesciences)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 2 conditions.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourMODERATE

A moderately rigorous design for a study of this type, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation0/20

    Non-randomised allocation

  • Blinding0/20

    Open-label

  • Control arm0/15

    No comparator arm stated in the record

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type10/10

    Mortality / MACE endpoint (hard clinical outcome)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 68 sites

  • Data monitoring committee7/7

    A data monitoring committee is in place

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 900 participants (target), run at 68 sites, across 6 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment29/40

    900 participants (target)

  • Site count21/25

    68 sites

  • Country count12/15

    6 countries

  • Planned duration10/10

    Planned over about 125 months

  • Sponsor scale6/10

    Edwards Lifesciences has led 47 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Summary

This study will establish the safety and effectiveness of the SAPIEN M3 System in subjects with symptomatic, at least 3+ mitral regurgitation (MR) for whom commercially available surgical or transcatheter treatment options are deemed unsuitable. Following completion of enrollment, subjects will be eligible for enrollment in the continued access phase of the trial.

This is a prospective single-arm, multicenter study.

Conditions

  • Mitral Regurgitation
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Eligibility

Eligibility
SexAll
Ages18 YearsNo maximum
Healthy volunteersNo

Eligibility as written in the registry

Inclusion Criteria: 1. 18 years of age or older 2. MR ≥ 3+ 3. NYHA functional class ≥ II 4. Per the Heart Team, commercially available surgical or transcatheter treatment options are deemed unsuitable due to clinical, anatomic or technical considerations. 5. Subject's heart failure management has been optimized based on subject characteristics and applicable guidelines, and stable for at least 30 days prior to enrollment. 6. The subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Mitral/cardiac anatomy that would preclude appropriate delivery and deployment of the SAPIEN M3 dock or valve 2. Inappropriate anatomy for femoral introduction and delivery of the SAPIEN M3 dock and valve 3. Presence of any device that will contact or interfere with the SAPIEN M3 System during delivery or after implantation 4. Left ventricular ejection fraction \<25% 5. Severe right ventricular dysfunction 6. Need for aortic, tricuspid or pulmonic valve intervention within the next 12 months 7. History of heart transplant 8. Cardiac imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation 9. Active bacterial endocarditis within 180 days of the procedure 10. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support within 30 days of the procedure 11. Myocardial infarction within 30 days of the procedure 12. Clinically significant untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization 13. Any percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, cardiovascular surgery, or carotid surgery within 30 days of the procedure 14. Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 90 days of the procedure 15. Irreversible, severe pulmonary hypertension 16. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring home oxygen therapy or chronic outpatient oral steroid use 17. Renal insufficiency or receiving renal replacement therapy 18. Liver disease 19. Planned surgery within the next 12 months 20. Inability to tolerate or a medical condition precluding treatment with antithrombotic therapy, including heparin administration during the procedure 21. Active infection requiring current antibiotic therapy 22. Active SARS-CoV-2 infection (Coronavirus-19 \[COVID-19\]) or previously diagnosed with COVID-19 with sequelae that could confound endpoint assessments 23. Leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or hypercoagulable states 24. Refusal of blood products 25. Female who is pregnant or lactating 26. Estimated life expectancy \<12 months due to non-cardiac conditions 27. Participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint 28. Subject considered to be part of a vulnerable population

Eligibility in plain statements

This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.

Study design

Study design
Study typeInterventional
PhaseNot applicable
AllocationNon-randomised
Intervention modelSINGLE_GROUP
Primary purposeTREATMENT
MaskingNONE (0)
Enrolment900 participants sought

Sponsor and collaborators

  • Edwards Lifesciences Sponsor

Arms and interventions

  • TMVR - Main CohortEXPERIMENTAL

    Subjects for whom commercially available surgical or transcatheter treatment options are deemed unsuitable will have transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR).

  • TMVR - Failed TEER RegistryEXPERIMENTAL

    Subjects who have had an attempted but failed transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) procedure will have TMVR.

  • TMVR - MAC RegistryEXPERIMENTAL

    Subjects with mitral annular calcification (MAC) will have TMVR.

Interventions

  • Device SAPIEN M3 valve and dock

    During the procedure a SAPIEN M3 dock and a SAPIEN M3 valve will be implanted via transseptal approach.

Outcome measures

  1. Primary outcome

    Non-hierarchical composite of death and heart failure rehospitalization

    Number of subjects with death and/or heart failure rehospitalization

    Time frame 1 year

  2. Secondary outcome

    Improvement in NYHA functional class compared to baseline

    New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of heart failure is based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from I-IV. I = no limitations of physical activity; II = slight limitations of physical activity, ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, shortness of breath; III = marked limitations of physical activity, less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or shortness of breath; IV = unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort, symptoms of heart failure at rest.

    Time frame 1 year

  3. Secondary outcome

    Improvement in KCCQ Overall Score compared to baseline

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

    Time frame 1 year

  4. Secondary outcome

    Improvement in MR compared to baseline

    Number of subjects with improved MR compared to baseline

    Time frame 1 year

  5. Secondary outcome

    Decrease in LVEDVi compared to baseline

    Number of subjects with decreased left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi) compared to baseline

    Time frame 1 year

Dates

Dates
Start dateNovember 12, 2020 (actual)
Primary completionFebruary 28, 2027 (estimated)
CompletionFebruary 28, 2031 (estimated)
First postedNovember 6, 2019 (actual)
Last updatedFebruary 25, 2026
Results postedNot stated in the registry record
Status last verifiedFebruary 2026

Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.

Locations

3 sites are recruiting

Australia

Australia
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Royal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownActive, not recruiting
The Prince Charles HospitalChermsideQueenslandActive, not recruiting

Canada

Canada
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Laval UniversityQuébecQuebecRecruiting
St. Michael'sTorontoRecruiting
St. PaulsVancouverRecruiting

Israel

Israel
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Shaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemWithdrawn
Rabin Medical CenterPetah TikvaActive, not recruiting
Sheba Medical CenterRamat GanWithdrawn

Netherlands

Netherlands
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Leiden University Medical CenterLeidenActive, not recruiting
Rotterdam Erasmus MCRotterdamActive, not recruiting

United Kingdom

United Kingdom
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Saint Thomas HospitalLondonActive, not recruiting
Saint Bartholomew's Medical CenterLondonActive, not recruiting

United States

United States
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Piedmont HealthcareAtlantaGeorgiaActive, not recruiting
Emory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaActive, not recruiting
Austin HeartAustinTexasActive, not recruiting
Medstar Union Memorial HospitalBaltimoreMarylandActive, not recruiting
Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical CenterBaton RougeLouisianaActive, not recruiting
Brigham & Women'sBostonMassachusettsWithdrawn
Massachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsActive, not recruiting
University of BuffaloBuffaloNew YorkActive, not recruiting
Novant Health and Vascular InstituteCharlotteNorth CarolinaActive, not recruiting
Carolinas Medical CenterCharlotteNorth CarolinaWithdrawn
Rush University Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisWithdrawn
The Christ HospitalCincinnatiOhioActive, not recruiting
Cleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioActive, not recruiting
Mount Carmel East HospitalColumbusOhioActive, not recruiting
Delray Medical CenterDelray BeachFloridaWithdrawn
Henry FordDetroitMichiganActive, not recruiting
Cardiac & Vascular Institute FoundationGainesvilleFloridaActive, not recruiting
Northshore University Health SystemGlenviewIllinoisActive, not recruiting
UT Memorial HermannHoustonTexasActive, not recruiting
HCA Houston Healthcare Medical (SCRI)HoustonTexasActive, not recruiting
Heart Center HospitalHuntsvilleAlabamaActive, not recruiting
St. Vincent Heart Center of IndianaIndianapolisIndianaWithdrawn
Ascension St. Vincent's HospitalJacksonvilleFloridaActive, not recruiting
University of KansasKansas CityKansasActive, not recruiting
Saint Luke's Kansas CityKansas CityMissouriActive, not recruiting
Scripps HealthLa JollaCaliforniaActive, not recruiting
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew HampshireActive, not recruiting
Good Samaritan HospitalLos AngelesCaliforniaActive, not recruiting
Kaiser Sunset LALos AngelesCaliforniaActive, not recruiting
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaActive, not recruiting
UC Health Northern Colorado (Medical Center of the Rockies)LovelandColoradoActive, not recruiting
University of WisconsinMadisonWisconsinWithdrawn
UPMC Heart and Vascular InstituteMechanicsburgPennsylvaniaActive, not recruiting
Minneapolis HeartMinneapolisMinnesotaWithdrawn
St. Patrick HospitalMissoulaMontanaWithdrawn
Morristown Medical CenterMorristownNew JerseyWithdrawn
Intermountain Medical CenterMurrayUtahActive, not recruiting
Naples Community HospitalNaplesFloridaActive, not recruiting

18 further sites are listed in the registry record.

Study documents

No documents are linked in this registry record.

Changes over time

No changes have been recorded since we first ingested this record.

A change is recorded each time the sponsor updates the registry record. Status, dates, enrolment and sites appear here as they move.