NCT07190300ClinicalTrials.gov
TulmiSTAR-02: A Phase I/II Open-label Study of Tulmimetostat in Combination With Darolutamide vs. Darolutamide, and Tulmimetostat With Abiraterone in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)
TulmiSTAR-02: A Two-part Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Tulmimetostat (DZR123) in Combination With Darolutamide or Abiraterone Followed by Open-label, Randomized, Phase II Dose Expansion Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Tulmimetostat in Combination With Darolutamide Versus Darolutamide Alone in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer
In brief
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the two different treatment combinations of tulmimetostat in participants with de novo or recurrent Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC).
Phase 1 / Phase 2181 participants sought31 sites14 countries
Categories
Registered in 1 registry
- ClinicalTrials.govNCT07190300Open this record at ClinicalTrials.govSynced 2 months ago
One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.
Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.
Interested in this study?
Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.
How this study is set up
The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.
- Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2025-09-24; recorded start 2026-01-13
- Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
- Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
- Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
- Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
- Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
- Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
- Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
- Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
- Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
- Present: Sponsor has 1128 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (Novartis Pharmaceuticals)
- Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
- The record lists 1 condition.
- Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
- Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.
Trial stature
Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.
A definitive-grade design for a phase 2 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.
How this score is built
- Randomised allocation20/20
Participants are randomly allocated between arms
- Blinding20/20
Quadruple-blind
- Control arm15/15
Active-comparator control arm
- Primary-outcome specificity10/10
Named primary outcome with a defined time frame
- Endpoint type3/10
Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)
- Multi-centre8/8
Multi-centre: 31 sites
- Data monitoring committee0/7
No data monitoring committee stated
- Prospective registration5/5
Registered before the study start date
- Protocol / SAP posted0/5
No protocol or SAP posted to the registry
A medium-sized study, international in scope: 181 participants (target), run at 31 sites, across 14 countries.
How this score is built
- Enrolment21/40
181 participants (target)
- Site count18/25
31 sites
- Country count12/15
14 countries
- Planned duration10/10
Planned over about 80 months
- Sponsor scale10/10
Novartis Pharmaceuticals has led 1,104 trials in our corpus
We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.
How this score is built
- Investigator standing0/100
No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial
These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.
Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the two different treatment combinations of tulmimetostat in participants with de novo or recurrent Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC).
Conditions
- Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC)
Eligibility
| Sex | Male |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years – No maximum |
| Healthy volunteers | No |
Eligibility as written in the registry
Eligibility in plain statements
This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.
Study design
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 1 / Phase 2 |
| Allocation | Randomised |
| Intervention model | PARALLEL |
| Primary purpose | TREATMENT |
| Masking | QUADRUPLE (4) |
| Enrolment | 181 participants sought |
Sponsor and collaborators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Sponsor
Arms and interventions
- Phase II: Arm 2EXPERIMENTAL
Tulmimetostat dose 2 PO + Darolutamide 600 mg PO BID
- Phase II: Arm 3ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Darolutamide 600 mg PO BID
- Phase I: Group A (part 1)EXPERIMENTAL
Tulmimetostat oral (PO) once a day (QD) escalating doses + Darolutamide 600 mg twice a day (BID)
- Phase I: Group B (part 2)EXPERIMENTAL
Tulmimetostat PO QD escalating doses + Abiraterone 1000 mg PO QD
- Phase II: Arm 1EXPERIMENTAL
Tulmimetostat dose 1 PO + Darolutamide 600 mg PO BID
Interventions
- Drug Abiraterone
1000 mg is administered orally QD
- Drug Darolutamide
600 mg is administered orally BID
- Drug Tulmimetostat
Doses of tulmimetostat beyond DL1 once a day (QD) will be opened depending on outcome of Dose Escalation Meetings (DEM(s))
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Phase I (Group A and Group B): Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)
A dose-limiting toxicity is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value, not clearly due to underlying disease or extraneous causes, that occurs within the first 28 days of treatment with tulmimetostat and meets any of the criteria specified in the protocol. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse events (NCI CTCAE) version 5.0 will be used for all grading. For the purpose of dose-escalation decisions, DLTs will be considered and included in the Bayesian Logistic Regression Model (BLRM).
Time frame Up to 28 days
Primary outcome
Phase I (Group A and Group B): Incidence rate of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
The analysis of adverse events will include categorization by type, frequency, and severity, as graded by the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Primary outcome
Phase I (Group A and Group B): Number of Participants with dose adjustments
The number of participants with dose adjustments (reductions, interruption, or permanent discontinuation) will be summarized by treatment arm.
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Primary outcome
Phase I (Group A and Group B): Dose Intensity
Dose intensity (computed as the ratio of actual cumulative dose received and actual duration of exposure) and the relative dose intensity (computed as the ratio of dose intensity and planned dose intensity) will be summarized by means of descriptive statistics
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Primary outcome
Phase I (Group A and Group B): Duration of exposure to each study drug
Duration of exposure (in months) to each study drug will be summarized by means of descriptive statistics
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Primary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate of < 0.2 ng/mL
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate is defined as proportion of participants who achieved a decline in PSA to \< 0.2 ng/mL at month 6 months, confirmed by a second PSA measurement ≥ 3 weeks later.
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group A): Plasma concentrations of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide pharmacokinetic (PK) samples will be obtained and evaluated in all participants at all dose levels by treatment arms
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group A): AUC of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf) and Area under the concentration-time curve calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state (AUCtau) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group A): Cmax of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Cmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group B): Plasma concentrations of Tulmimetostat and Abiraterone
Tulmimetostat and Abiraterone pharmacokinetic (PK) samples will be obtained and evaluated in all participants at all dose levels by treatment arms
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours), Day 2 (0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group B): AUC of Tulmimetostat and Abiraterone
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf) and Area under the concentration-time curve calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state (AUCtau) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours), Day 2 (0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase I (Group B): Cmax of Tulmimetostat and Abiraterone
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Cmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours), Day 2 (0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Radiographic progression free survival (rPFS)
Radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) is defined as the time between randomization and the first occurrence of disease progression as per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1 or death due to any cause
Time frame From date of randomization until date of radiographic progression or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A):Overall survival (OS)
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time between randomization to date of death due to any cause
Time frame From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Objective response (OR)
Objective response (OR) is defined as a confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3)-modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator
Time frame From date of randomization until date of confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Best Overall response (BOR)
Best Overall response (BOR) is defined as the best response per PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence
Time frame From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever come first, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Duration of response (DOR)
Duration of response (DOR) defined as time between first documented CR/PR and disease progression per PCWG3-modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator or death due to any cause
Time frame From date of randomization until date of progression or date of death from any cause, whichever come first, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Prostate-Specific Antigen 50 (PSA50)
Prostate-Specific Antigen 50 (PSA50) is defined as a ≥ 50% decrease in PSA levels from baseline at any timepoint, confirmed by a second PSA measurement ≥ 3 weeks without any PSA progression in between
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of <0.1 ng/mL
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response of \<0.1 ng/mL is defined as PSA level \< 0.1 ng/mL at any timepoint during the trial from randomization
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)
Time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of one of the following events: PSA progression, radiological progression by bone lesions, or radiological progression by soft tissue and visceral lesions
Time frame From date of randomization until date of PSA progression, radiological progression by bone lesions, or radiological progression by soft tissue and visceral lesions, whichever comes first, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Incidence rate of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
The analysis of adverse events will include categorization by type, frequency, and severity, as graded by the NCI CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Number of Participants with dose adjustments
The number of participants with dose adjustments (reductions, interruption, or permanent discontinuation) will be summarized by treatment arm.
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Dose Intensity
Dose intensity (computed as the ratio of actual cumulative dose received and actual duration of exposure) and the relative dose intensity (computed as the ratio of dose intensity and planned dose intensity) will be summarized by means of descriptive statistics
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Duration of exposure to each study drug
Duration of exposure to each study drug will be summarized by means of descriptive statistics
Time frame From date of randomization till 30 days safety fup, assessed up to approximately 79 months
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Plasma concentrations of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
In selected number of participants receiving Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide combination therapy in Phase II, or in selected number of participants if only one dose level of Tulmimetostat is evaluated in combination with Darolutamide in Phase II, Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide pharmacokinetic (PK) samples will be obtained and evaluated in all participants at all dose levels by treatment arms
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): AUC of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
In selected number of participants receiving tulmimetostat and darolutamide combination therapy in Phase II, or in selected number of participants if only one dose level of tulmimetostat is evaluated in combination with darolutamide in Phase II, venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf) and Area under the concentration-time curve calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state (AUCtau) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Cmax of Tulmimetostat and Darolutamide
In selected number of participants receiving tulmimetostat and darolutamide combination therapy in Phase II, or in selected number of participants if only one dose level of tulmimetostat is evaluated in combination with darolutamide in Phase II, venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Cmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour, 0.5 hours, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours and 8 hours). Cycle 1: Day 2 (Tulmimetostat only: 0 hour and 24 hours), Days 8 and 15 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Plasma concentrations of Tulmimetostat
Tulmimetostat pharmacokinetic (PK) samples will be obtained and evaluated in all participants at all dose levels by treatment arms
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): AUC of Tulmimetostat
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero (pre-dose) extrapolated to infinite time (AUCinf) and Area under the concentration-time curve calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state (AUCtau) will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Cmax of Tulmimetostat
Venous whole blood samples will be collected for activity-based pharmacokinetics characterization. Cmax will be listed and summarized using descriptive statistics.
Time frame Cycle 1-2: Day 1 (0 hour and 2 hours). Cycles 3-5: Day 1 (0 hour). 1 cycle = 28 days.
Secondary outcome
Phase II (Group A): Time to first symptomatic skeletal event (TTSSE)
Time to first symptomatic skeletal event (TTSSE) is defined as the time from randomization to the first new symptomatic pathological bone fracture, spinal cord compression, tumor-related orthopedic surgical intervention, requirement for radiation therapy to relieve bone pain or death from any cause, whichever occurs first
Time frame From randomization until the first occurrence of a new symptomatic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, tumor-related orthopedic surgery, radiation therapy for bone pain, or death, assessed up to 79 months.
Dates
| Start date | January 13, 2026 (actual) |
|---|---|
| Primary completion | August 2, 2032 (estimated) |
| Completion | August 2, 2032 (estimated) |
| First posted | September 24, 2025 (actual) |
| Last updated | June 23, 2026 |
| Results posted | Not stated in the registry record |
| Status last verified | June 2026 |
Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.
Locations
30 sites are recruiting
Australia
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Camperdown | New South Wales | Withdrawn |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Wollongong | New South Wales | Recruiting |
Brazil
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | Recruiting |
Canada
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Montreal | Quebec | Recruiting |
China
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Guangzhou | Recruiting |
France
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Créteil | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Lille | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Nantes | Recruiting |
Germany
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Essen | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Jena | Thuringia | Recruiting |
Hong Kong
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Hong Kong | Recruiting |
Hungary
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Budapest | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Budapest | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Szeged | Recruiting |
Italy
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Rozzano | MI | Recruiting |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Verona | VR | Recruiting |
South Korea
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Seoul | Recruiting |
Spain
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Recruiting | |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Madrid | Recruiting |
Turkey (Türkiye)
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Ankara | Sihhiye-Altindag | Recruiting |
United Kingdom
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | London | Recruiting |
United States
| Facility | City | State or region | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Univ of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | Recruiting |
| Medical University of South Carolina MUSC | Charleston | South Carolina | Recruiting |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | Recruiting |
| Uni Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | Recruiting |
| Carolina Urologic Research Center | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | Recruiting |
| Huntsman Cancer Institute | Salt Lake City | Utah | Recruiting |
| University of Kansas Cancer Center | Westwood | Kansas | Recruiting |
| Wichita Urology Group PA | Wichita | Kansas | Recruiting |
Study documents
No documents are linked in this registry record.
Changes over time
No changes have been recorded since we first ingested this record.
A change is recorded each time the sponsor updates the registry record. Status, dates, enrolment and sites appear here as they move.