Skip to main content
xMedica

NCT07667803ClinicalTrials.gov

A Master Protocol to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Elecoglipron in Participants With Obesity or Overweight With or Without T2DM

A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Multicenter Master Protocol to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elecoglipron in Participants With Obesity or Overweight With or Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Embold)

RecruitingTaking participants now, according to the registry record.
Contact this study

In brief

This master study protocol, Study D7260C00015, covers 2 independent, pivotal studies, Study 1 and Study 2. Each study is a global, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of elecoglipron compared with placebo adjunct…

Phase 34,500 participants sought325 sites19 countries

Categories

Registered in 1 registry

One study can be registered in several registries. We show it once and link every record we hold.

Trial information is shown as published by the registry, in its original language.

Interested in this study?

Sign in or create an account to register your interest and follow this study.

How this study is set up

The points below are drawn from the public registry record for this study. Each one cites the field or sentence it came from. A dash (—) means the record does not state something — not that it is missing or wrong. Many well-run studies, especially small ones, leave some of these blank.

  • Present: Registered before enrolment beganFirst posted 2026-06-25; recorded start 2026-06-29
  • Present: Has a defined primary outcomeA primary outcome measure is listed in the record
  • Present: The primary outcome states a time frameThe primary outcome measure records a time frame
  • Present: Participants are randomly assignedAllocation is recorded as randomised
  • Present: Has a comparison groupThe record lists a placebo or comparator arm, or more than one study arm
  • Present: Uses blinding (masking)A masking level is recorded in the record
  • Not stated: An ethics committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no ethics-committee field
  • Not stated: Regulatory oversight (such as an IND or IDE) is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no regulatory-authorisation field
  • Not stated: A data monitoring committee is not stated in the registry recordThis registry's ingested record has no data-monitoring-committee fieldA data monitoring committee is not required for many smaller studies, and its absence here is not unusual.
  • Present: No cost to participants is mentioned in the recordChecked the summary, description and eligibility text; no cost-to-participant phrase found
  • Present: Sponsor has 1019 other studies in this databaseCounted from the lead sponsor named in the record (AstraZeneca)
  • Present: Sponsor has posted results for at least one studyBased on the sponsor’s studies in this database
  • The record lists 1 condition.
  • Lead sponsor type recorded as: industry.
  • Intervention regulatory context: investigational, within a phased regulatory pathway.

Trial stature

Three independent measures of this study, described from its registry record — not a recommendation about it. A rigorous study by investigators nobody has heard of is better evidence than a weak study led by a famous one. How these are scored.

Methodological rigourSTRONG

A strong methodological design for a phase 3 study, judged from its ClinicalTrials.gov record.

How this score is built
  • Randomised allocation20/20

    Participants are randomly allocated between arms

  • Blinding16/20

    Triple-blind

  • Control arm13/15

    Placebo / sham control arm

  • Primary-outcome specificity10/10

    Named primary outcome with a defined time frame

  • Endpoint type3/10

    Surrogate or intermediate endpoint (conservative default)

  • Multi-centre8/8

    Multi-centre: 321 sites

  • Data monitoring committee0/7

    No data monitoring committee stated

  • Prospective registration5/5

    Registered before the study start date

  • Protocol / SAP posted0/5

    No protocol or SAP posted to the registry

ScaleLARGE

A large study, international in scope: 4,500 participants (target), run at 325 sites, across 19 countries.

How this score is built
  • Enrolment35/40

    4,500 participants (target)

  • Site count25/25

    321 sites

  • Country count15/15

    19 countries

  • Planned duration8/10

    Planned over about 38 months

  • Sponsor scale10/10

    AstraZeneca has led 991 trials in our corpus

Investigator standingUNKNOWN

We have no verifiable track record for the investigator named on this trial. That is common for early-career investigators and for records held outside ClinicalTrials.gov — it is not a negative signal.

How this score is built
  • Investigator standing0/100

    No investigator recorded in the registry for this trial

These describe the registry record only, and today we hold ClinicalTrials.gov data. Absent fields lower a score, and absence often reflects registration practice rather than study quality. A high-stature trial is not necessarily safer or a better choice for you — enrolling in a large definitive trial can mean a higher chance of receiving placebo, while a small early-phase study may be the only route to a new therapy.

Summary

This master study protocol, Study D7260C00015, covers 2 independent, pivotal studies, Study 1 and Study 2. Each study is a global, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of elecoglipron compared with placebo adjunct to diet and exercise for weight management, in adults living with obesity or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity, and without T2DM (Study 1) or with T2DM (Study 2).

This is a Phase III, global, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of elecoglipron compared with placebo, given once daily as oral tablets. This protocol covers two independent pivotal studies in adults aged 18 years and above, who are living with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), or overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and have at least 1 weight-related comorbidity (Hypertension, Prediabetes, Dyslipidemia, CV disease and/or Obstructive sleep apnea) without T2DM (Study 1) and as well as those who are living with obesity or overweight with T2DM (Study 2). Approximately 3000 participants will be randomized in the study 1 and 1500 participants in the study 2. The primary endpoint is percent change in body weight from baseline at 72 weeks.

Conditions

  • Weight Management

Eligibility

Eligibility
SexAll
Ages18 YearsNo maximum
Healthy volunteersNo

Eligibility as written in the registry

Inclusion Criteria * Legal age of consent and at least 18 years old * Study 1 - * BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or * 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI \< 30 kg/m2 with at least one of the following weight-related comorbidities: * Hypertension * Prediabetes * Dyslipidemia * Cardiovascular disease * Obstructive sleep apnea. * Study 2 - BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and T2DM defined as below: * Established diagnosis of T2DM * Without established diagnosis of T2DM and HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at the screening visit * Stable body weight (self-reported or documented) for 90 days prior to the screening visit (± 5% body weight change) * History of at least one self-reported unsuccessful dietary effort to lose body weight. Exclusion Criteria * Study 1 - Established diagnosis of T1DM or T2DM. * Study 2 - Any of the following medical history, laboratory values, or complications related to diabetes: * T1DM * HbA1c ≥ 10% (86 mmol/mol) at the screening visit * Currently receiving, or anticipated to receive, therapeutic intervention for diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema. * Have had more than one episode of severe hypoglycemia within 180 days prior to the screening visit, or has a history of hypoglycemia unawareness or poor recognition of hypoglycemic symptoms * History of acute (unless due to previously resolved gallstone pancreatitis and post-cholecystectomy) or chronic pancreatitis * History/family history (first degree biologic relatives) of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Eligibility in plain statements

This record's criteria have not been broken into separate statements yet. The registry text above is complete and is the authoritative version.

Study design

Study design
Study typeInterventional
PhasePhase 3
AllocationRandomised
Intervention modelPARALLEL
Primary purposeTREATMENT
MaskingTRIPLE (3)
Enrolment4,500 participants sought

Sponsor and collaborators

  • AstraZeneca Sponsor

Arms and interventions

  • Arm 1 - Dose 1EXPERIMENTAL

    Active IMP

  • Arm 2 - Dose 2EXPERIMENTAL

    Active IMP

  • Arm 3 - PlaceboPLACEBO_COMPARATOR

    Placebo matching elecoglipron

Interventions

  • Drug Elecoglipron

    Elecoglipron film-coated tablet once daily

  • Drug Placebo

    Placebo matching elecoglipron film-coated tablet once daily

Outcome measures

  1. Primary outcome

    Percent body weight loss

    Percent change from baseline to Week 72 in body weight

    Time frame 72 weeks

  2. Secondary outcome

    Absolute body weight loss

    Absolute change from baseline to Week 72 in body weight (kg)

    Time frame 72 weeks

  3. Secondary outcome

    Total body weight loss of at least 5%, 10%, and 15%

    * Achieved ≥ 5% body weight loss from baseline at Week 72 * Achieved ≥ 10% body weight loss from baseline at Week 72 * Achieved ≥ 15% body weight loss from baseline at Week 72

    Time frame 72 weeks

  4. Secondary outcome

    Percent body weight loss in participants with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m2 at baseline

    Percent change from baseline to Week 72 in body weight

    Time frame 72 weeks

  5. Secondary outcome

    Waist circumference reduction

    Absolute change from baseline to Week 72 in waist circumference (cm)

    Time frame 72 weeks

  6. Secondary outcome

    Glycemic control

    Change from baseline to Week 72 in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%)

    Time frame 72 weeks

  7. Secondary outcome

    Achieving normoglycemia in participants with HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (39 mmol/mol) at baseline

    Achieved normoglycemia (HbA1c \< 5.7% \[39 mmol/mol\]) at Week 72

    Time frame 72 weeks

  8. Secondary outcome

    Study 2 only: Achieving glycemic control in participants with HbA1c ≥ 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at baseline

    * Achieved HbA1c \< 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at Week 72 * Achieved HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at Week 72

    Time frame 72 weeks

  9. Secondary outcome

    Systolic blood pressure reduction

    Change from baseline to Week 72 in systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

    Time frame 72 weeks

Dates

Dates
Start dateJune 29, 2026 (actual)
Primary completionJuly 31, 2028 (estimated)
CompletionJuly 30, 2029 (estimated)
First postedJune 25, 2026 (actual)
Last updatedSeptember 9, 2026
Results postedNot stated in the registry record
Status last verifiedSeptember 2026

Actual means the event happened. Estimated means the sponsor expects it. The two mean different things.

Locations

109 sites are recruiting

Argentina

Argentina
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Research SiteBuenos AiresRecruiting
Research SiteBuenos AiresRecruiting
Research SiteCABANot yet recruiting
Research SiteCABARecruiting
Research SiteCabaRecruiting
Research SiteCapital FederalRecruiting
Research SiteGranadero BaigorriaNot yet recruiting
Research SiteLanusNot yet recruiting
Research SiteRosarioRecruiting
Research SiteRosarioNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSan NicolásNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSan VicenteNot yet recruiting

Australia

Australia
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Research SiteBotanyRecruiting
Research SiteCamberwellRecruiting
Research SiteCharlestownRecruiting
Research SiteMaroubraRecruiting
Research SiteSt AlbansRecruiting
Research SiteSt LeonardsRecruiting

Brazil

Brazil
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Research SiteBelémNot yet recruiting
Research SiteBrasíliaNot yet recruiting
Research SiteCampinasNot yet recruiting
Research SiteCampinasNot yet recruiting
Research SiteCuritibaNot yet recruiting
Research SiteFortalezaNot yet recruiting
Research SitePorto AlegreNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSão José dos CamposNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSão PauloNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSão PauloNot yet recruiting
Research SiteSão PauloNot yet recruiting

Canada

Canada
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Research SiteBramptonOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteCalgaryAlbertaRecruiting
Research SiteCalgaryAlbertaNot yet recruiting
Research SiteHamiltonOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteJolietteQuebecRecruiting
Research SiteMonctonNew BrunswickRecruiting
Research SiteMontrealQuebecRecruiting
Research SiteNiagara FallsOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteNorth YorkOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteSaint-LambertQuebecRecruiting
Research SiteSarniaOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteScarborough VillageOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteStouffvilleOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteTerrebonneQuebecRecruiting
Research SiteTorontoOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteTorontoOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteTorontoOntarioRecruiting
Research SiteTruroNova ScotiaRecruiting
Research SiteVancouverBritish ColumbiaRecruiting
Research SiteVictoriaBritish ColumbiaRecruiting

Chile

Chile
FacilityCityState or regionStatus
Research SiteAraucaniaNot yet recruiting

275 further sites are listed in the registry record.

Study documents

No documents are linked in this registry record.

Changes over time

  1. September 9, 2026

    Site added

    4 sites added (325 total)

    321325